Conclusions

In human culture it's much better to be ''the dumb/funny/lively'' person than ''the dark/independant/thinker'' person.The reaction a person recievs while being ''dumb'' is positive by stamping him/her as ''the fun(ny) one'' or ''talkative one'' ect.Yet when you are lonely think to yourself and deep you are stamped as ''the weirdo'' or ''that person''.
So I have come upon a conclusion that people in general are looking towards more positive attractions,and apparently most of us are incredebly naive.Accepting someone who isn't as positive as others is simply out of the question. In terms of getting a job both are equal,BECAUSE the ''dumb'' person gets the job through connections and support and the lonely guy gets it because he's used to get what he wants alone.So then if you wish to have connections then be the lively one,if not then be the lonely one,the real difference is the ''connections'' which most of them are pretty useless as you know.Why do we need acceptance anyway?I guess it's from back in our childhood,when our mothers or fathers or both wanted us to go and make friends,that determines our life from there on.I believe it's best if the child is individual,because the productive rate would increase and self knowledge would be higher,also the pace in which you would go would be much more steady and quite possibly quicker than of those who have ''friends'',the emotional state would be stable yet communicational skill would be ''damaged'' from lonesome.